首页> 外文OA文献 >Screening tests for syphilis. A comparison of the Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay with two automated serological tests.
【2h】

Screening tests for syphilis. A comparison of the Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay with two automated serological tests.

机译:梅毒筛查。梅毒螺旋体血凝试验与两种自动血清学检测的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Two Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay (TPHA) tests (Wellcome and Fuzizoki) were compared with the automated reagin test and the automated Reiter protein complement-fixation test in a routine screening system. The Wellcome TPHA was shown to lack sensitivity, and it is recommended that it should be used at a lower screening dilution. The Fuzizoki TPHA recorded a significant number of false positive and false negative results, and was therefore inferior to the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA-ABS) test as a definitive test for syphilis. It is suggested that the TPHA be used in conjunction with a reagin test to replace some of the more inadequate screening tests currently in use. The automated screening tests were shown to have a similar sensitivity to the TPHA as well as several other advantages; they are recommended for testing large numbers of specimens.
机译:在常规筛查系统中,比较了两个梅毒螺旋体血凝试验(TPHA)测试(Wellcome和Fuzizoki)与自动血脂测试和自动Reiter蛋白补体固定测试。已显示,Wellcome TPHA缺乏敏感性,建议以较低的筛选稀释度使用它。 Fuzizoki TPHA记录了大量假阳性和假阴性结果,因此不如作为确定性梅毒测试的荧光螺旋体抗体吸收(FTA-ABS)测试。建议将TPHA与试剂测试结合使用,以代替当前使用的一些较不充分的筛选测试。自动化筛选测试显示对TPHA具有相似的敏感性以及其他一些优点。建议将它们用于测试大量样本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号